Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 73 Download : 112

Main Article Content

Abstract

Samarinda City, according to Samarinda Long Term Planning, was directed to be a sustainable city with a smart city as its foundation. The plan was in line with the Movement to 100 Smart Cities in Indonesia. Therefore, Samarinda City compiled Masterplan of Samarinda Smart City 2017-2002 to support the movement. The local government’s capacity to support the smart government concept had to be addressed by evaluating variables for enhancing the capacity using the scoring method. As stated in the Internal Affair Minister’s presentation on Smart City Development, the sample populations are government bodies. Regarding scoring analysis using each collected respondent response, Samarinda City scored point accounted for 2.1 meaning MEDIUM.

Keywords

Capacity Evaluation Local Government

Article Details

References

  1. Alfiyah, N. I. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan e-Government Pada Pembangunan Smart City di Kabupaten Sumenep. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4800
  2. Annisah, A. (2018). USULAN PERENCANAAN SMART CITY: SMART GOVERNANCE PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN MUKOMUKO*. Masyarakat Telematika Dan Informasi : Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 8(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.17933/mti.v8i1.103
  3. Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan dan Praktik (6th ed.). Rineka Cipta.
  4. Bappenas. (2015). Konsep Pengembangan Kota Cerdas Yang Berdaya Saing.
  5. Boyd Cohen. (2014). Smart City Index Master Indicators Survey. Smart Cities Council. http://smartcitiescouncil. com/resources/smart-city-index-masterindicators-survey
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth edition). SAGE.
  7. Dinoroy Marganda Aritonang. (2017). The Impact of E-Government System on Public Service Quality in Indonesia. European Scientific Journal, 13(35), 99–111.
  8. Dwihastari, S., & Marom, A. (2017). Analisis Pengembangan Kapasitas Kelembagaan Pada Badan Kepegawaian, Pendidikan, dan Pelatihan Kota Semarang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 6(2), 215–225.
  9. Huda, M., & Yunas, N. (2016). The Development of e-Government System in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 08(01), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.08.2016.97-108
  10. I. P. A. E. Pratama. (2014). Smart City Beserta Cloud Computing dan Teknologi-Teknologi Pendukung. Informatika.
  11. Ida Farida, Refly Setiawan, Anastasia Sri Maryatmi, & Masayu Nila Juwita. (2020). The Implementation of E-Government in The Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 22(2), 340–346.
  12. Imam Gunawan. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori & Praktik. Bumi Aksara.
  13. Leidel, M., Niemann, S., & Hagemann, N. (2012). Capacity development as a key factor for integrated water resources management (IWRM): Improving water management in the Western Bug River Basin, Ukraine. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65(5), 1415–1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1223-5
  14. Lola Oktavia. (2020). Penilaian Penerimaan E-Government Di Indonesia. Jurnal CoreIT: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Ilmu Komputer Dan Teknologi Informasi, 6(1), 15–21.
  15. Nasir, M., & Sikumbang, R. (1998). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
  16. Nastiti Novia Ayuningtyas, Arfiah Busairi, & Andriawan Kustiawan. (2019). Pengaruh Inflasi dan Pertumbuhan Penduduk Terhadap Tingkat Pengangguran Di Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Mulawarman (JIEM), 3(4).
  17. Ratnasari, J. D., Makmur, M., & Ribawanto, H. (2013). Pengembangan Kapasitas Kelembagaan Pada Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Kabupaten Jombang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(3), 103–110.
  18. Rudolf Giffinger, Christian Fertner, Hans Kramar, & Evert Meijers. (2007). City-Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Cent. Reg. Sci. Vienna UT, 1–12.
  19. Setyaji, A. P., Dwimawanti, I. H., & Harsono. (2022). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik dalam Pengurusan Akta Pencatatan Sipil pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Tegal. Indonesian Governance Journal (Kajian Politik - Pemerintahan), 5(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.5.2.2022.142-149
  20. Soeprapto, R. (2003). Capacity Building of Local Government Towards Good Governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik FIA Universitas Brawijaya, 4.
  21. Subekti, T., & Gustomy, R. (2018). Menguji Sistem E-Government Kota Malang Menuju Smart City. Interaktif: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(1).
  22. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Alfabeta.
  23. Syaharie Jaang. (2020). Warga Samarinda Tak Perlu Lagi ke Disdukcapil, Cukup Via WhatsApp [Kaltim Today].
  24. Ulum, C. (2018). Manajemen E-Government dalam Rangka Capacity Building Birokrasi di Indonesia. BISMA (Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 2(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v2n2.p167-172
  25. Wismanu, R. E., Nuh, M., Widodo, N., & Aziz, N. A. (2018). Model Inovasi Pemerintah Daerah Bidang Pelayanan Perizinan dalam Mewujudkan Smart City (Studi Pendekatan Sistem Dinamik pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Sragen). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 4(4), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2018.004.04.12
  26. Yuwono, T. (2003, January 7). Capacity Building in the Local Government: Concept and Analysis. Seminar Intemasional Democracy and Local Politics, Yogyakarta.