Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 794 Download : 702

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Indonesia-Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IK-CEPA) is a significant bilateral agreement in the trade and economic fields between Indonesia and South Korea. It is based on three main pillars: market access for trade in goods and services, trade and investment facilitation, and cooperation and capacity building. This study aims to analyze the bilateral relationship between Indonesia and South Korea through the lens of IK-CEPA, with a particular focus on the rationale, implementation, obstacles, and significance of this cooperation. Using a qualitative approach with a descriptive method, the study collects data through document-based research, internet-based research, and interviews. To ensure data validity and reliability, data triangulation procedures are applied. The study finds that IK-CEPA requires Indonesia and South Korea to commit to higher tariff positions and to facilitate market access and better protection for investors. This fosters a closer relationship between the two countries and enables interdependence. Both countries complement each other's weaknesses to meet their national interests. Although obstacles exist in the negotiation process and the signing of IK-CEPA, the bilateral relationship between Indonesia and South Korea is improving and demonstrating success in economic cooperation.

Keywords

International Relations IK-CEPA Bilateral Cooperation South Korea Trade Agreement

Article Details

Author Biography

Arfin Sudirman, Padjadjaran University

Faculty of Social and Political Science

References

  1. Abdullah, R. (2017). Analysis of Trade in Goods between Indonesia and South Korea on Cooperation Forum IK-CEPA.Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 8(6(J), 171- 182. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v8i6(j).1491
  2. Aulia, N. (2017). Kerjasama Ekonomi Indonesia-Korea Selatan Melalui Working Level Task ForceMeeting (WLTFM) Dalam Peningkatan Perekonomian Indonesia. Bandung: UNIKOM.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik, (2020), Berita Resmi Statistik: Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan IV 2019, No. 17/02/Th.XXIV
  4. Bila, N. S., & Wijayati, H. (2022) The Impact of IK-CEPA (Indonesia-South Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement) for Indonesia. Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research, 1(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v1i3.908
  5. Cholif, U. M., & Paksi, A. K. (2022). South Korea’s Interest Behind the Reactivation of IK-CEPA Negotiations with Indonesi. Insignia: Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 20-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.ins.2022.9.1.5089
  6. Dae-Chang, K. (2013). The 40th Anniversary of Economic Relations between Korea and Indonesia. Retrieved from keia.org: http://keia.org/sites/default/files/publications/koreaseconomy_2013_chapter6.pdf
  7. DP, Y. A. (2019). CEPA Indonesia-korea Sempat Berhenti Setelah berunding 7 putaran. Bisnis.com. Retrieved November 1, 2022, from https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190220/12/891033/cepa-indonesia-korea-sempat-berhenti-setelah-berunding-7-putaran
  8. Eldo, D. H. A. P., & Inzana, N. (2022). Peluang dan Tantangan Smart village di Era 4.0 (Studi Analisis Desa Dukuhjati Kidul Kabupaten Tegal). Indonesian Governance Journal: Kajian Politik-Pemerintah, 5(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.5.2.2022.84-95
  9. Hariyanti, D. (2014). IK-CEPA: Indonesia Defensif dalam Perundingan dengan Korsel. http://industri.bisnis.com/read/20140909/257/256111/ik-cepa-indonesia-defensif-dalam-perundingan-dengan-korsel diakses pada tanggal 27 Mei 2018 pukul 14.30 WIB.
  10. Hocking, B. (2012). Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21 Century. Netherlands: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
  11. Ismail, A. (2018). Pendekatan Behavioralisme dan Kendala Perundingan Indonesia-Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IK-CEPA). Jurnal ISIP Universitas Indonesia, 35-43.
  12. Ismail, A., & Mulyaman, D. M. (2018). Pendekatan Behavioralisme dan Kendala Perundingan Indonesia-Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IK-CEPA). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 15(2), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.36451/j.isip.v15i2.17
  13. Jackson, R., & Sorensen, G. (2014). Pengantar Penelitian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  14. Kemendag RI. (2020, December 18). Indonesia-Korea CEPA : Tonggak Baru Hubungan Ekonomi Bilateral Kedua Negara. Retrieved from Kemendag RI: https://ditjenppi.kemendag.go.id/index.php/berita/detail/indonesiakorea-cepa-tonggak-baru-hubungan-ekonomi-bilateral-kedua-negara
  15. Kemendag RI. (2021, Desember 8). IK CEPA: Langkah Strategis Perkuat Hubungan Bilateral Indonesia-Korea Selatan ke Tahap yang Lebih Tinggi. Retrieved from Kemendag RI: https://ditjenppi.kemendag.go.id/index.php/berita/detail/ik-cepa-langkah-strategis-perkuat-hubungan-bilateral-indonesia-korea-ke-tahap-yang-lebih-tinggi
  16. Kemlu. (2022). Profil Negara dan Hubungan Bilateral. Retrieved 30 Agustus 2022, from https://kemlu.go.id/seoul/id/pages/hubungan_bilateral/558/etc-menu
  17. Korean Government. (2020). FTA CEPA Korean. FTA CEPA. Retrieved October 19, 2022, from https://www.fta.go.kr/main/situation/kfta/lov3/id/2/
  18. Mahendra, G. K., & Suryani, D. A. (2021). Analisis Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Desa Wisata Gamplong. Indonesian Governance Journal: Kajian Politik-Pemerintahan, 4(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.4.2.2021.%25p
  19. Masitoh, S., & Hidayat, K. (2022). Indonesia – Korea Selatan Sepakati Sejumlah Kerja sama Strategis. Retrieved 29 Agustus 2022, from https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/indonesia-korea-selatan-sepakati-sejumlah-kerja-sama-strategis
  20. Mulyaningsih. (2021). Analisis Perilaku Birokrasi, Pola Komunikasi dan Regulasi dalam Pelayanan Publik di Masa Pandemi. Indonesian Governance Journal: Kajian Politik-Pemerintah, 4(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.4.2.2021.%25p
  21. Pratiwi, R. (2019). Hubungan Dagang Internasional Indonesia dan Korea Selatan 2011-2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 1906-1920.
  22. Ruffini, P. B. (2016). International Trade and Foreign Affairs – Some Reflections on Economic Diplomacy. Journal of International Logistic and Trade, 14(1), 27-34.
  23. Santia, T. (2020, December 18). Mendag : Perjanjian IK-CEPA Perbesar Akses Pasar Indonesia-Korea Selatan. Retrieved from Kompas: https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4436690/mendag-perjanjian-ik-cepa-perbesar-akses-pasar-indonesia-korea-selatan
  24. Susilo. (2017, November 9). Presiden : Kemitraan Indonesia-Korsel Mnejadi “Spesial Strategic Partnership”. Retrieved from Antaranews: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/663932/presiden-kemitraan indonesia-korsel-menjadi-special-strategic-partnership
  25. Tuhumury, Y. J. (2020). Membangun Good Governance dalam Pemanfaatan Keuangan Desa (Studi pada Desa Wayame Kecamatan Teluk Ambon). Indonesian Governance Journal: Kajian Politik-Pemerintah, 3(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.3.1.2020.%25p
  26. Wibisono, B. A. (2017). Penurunan Perdagangan Bilateral Indonesia- Korea Selatan dalam Kerja Sama Working Level Task Force Meeting (WLTFM). eJournal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 5(4),1381-1396.
  27. Yanuar, I. (2014). Metodologi & Teori Hubungan Internasional. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
  28. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research: From Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.
  29. Vandayani, D. S., & Widiyarta, A. (2022). Collaborative Governance dalam Pengembangan Kampung Majapahit Sebagai Desa Wisata di Desa Bejijong Kecamtan Trowulan Kabupaten Mojokerto. Indonesian Governance Journal: Kajian Politik-Pemerintahan, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.5.1.2022.%25p
  30. Zitri, I., Lestanata, Y., & Pratama, I. N. (2020). Strategi Pemerintah Desa dalam Pengembangan Obyek Wisata Berbasis Masyarakat (Community Based Toursm)(Studi Kasus Pulau Kenawa di Desa Poto Tano Kecamatan Poto Tano Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat). Indonesian Governance Journal: Kajian Politik-Pemerintahan, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.3.2.2020.%25p

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'